mobrec

So
After a week of listening to the coverage of Katrina (and the aftermath) there are some things that I just need to get off my chest:

As bad as it is, stop calling it 'our tsunami'. There is a big difference between something that happen with little or no warning and something that happened with several days warning that some people either didn't react to or couldn't react to. Why does there have to be competition over whose natural disaster was worse? They are all horrible and provide an opportunity to see the best (and worst) in people.

In New Orleans, the situation rapidly turned into a Y2K-esque worst case scenario: no power, no water, no communications, armed mobs looting and pillaging with the government unable to respond. Except in this real life scenario, this was not the result of some errant computer software. This was a fatal combination of natural disaster and the worst side of humankind.

Before Katrina hit, it seems that there were those who couldn't move because they didn't have cars or some other means of getting around or out of the city because they are poor. This might have something to do with the fact that the poverty rate in the US has grown to 12.5% under the current administration. Apparently the poor are good enough to fight wars, but not worth rescuing or looking out for properly — sickening.

Another point that I am struggling with regarding the slow federal response is 'because it is a very complicated situation that no one could have foreseen'. Then how do we account for the Hurricane Pam simulations that showed almost exactly what was going to happen? You might ask yourself how can the international press get camera crews, helicopters, ground transport, etc to freely go in to areas to broadcast (some might say, exploit) those impacted by this disaster, but the government doesn't seem to be as resourceful. Nor does it seem that the press has enough integrity to try to bring in whatever aid they can while covering the events.

The National Guard, who typically play a crucial role in providing swift and effective assistance during natural disasters are hobbled by the fact that 40% of Mississippi's and 35% of Louisiana's National Guard are in Iraq.

This event seems to me to be an example of the current administrations domestic policy writ large: if you have money, you're ok, you can evacuate (you can basically do whatever you want); if you don't, then they really don't give a damn about what happens to you. So you have a situation were the administration cut funding for levee enhancements/maintenance because of 'the war', but then turned around and provided a 31 billion USD handout to oil companies that are already making multi-billion dollar profits quarterly. Then you have gun toating idiots wrecking havoc, because we need more guns in this country, right NRA? I can already hear their twisted response, 'well, if everyone had a gun, they could defend themselves against the bandits' Right, we all know that the solution to cleaning up an oil slick is to pour more oil on it...

Thankfully, the situation seems to be improving. I just hope that this country learns a lesson from this disaster and is able to grow in a more positive direction.

One final note: it seems ironic to me that the Administration has been on TV and radio telling those who have Labor Day plans (which in the US is 'a yearly national tribute to the contributions workers have made to the strength, prosperity, and well-being of our country.') to stay home, and not have any inessential travel.

So
WoooHooo. I finally broke the 1000 views 'milestone' on my Flickr account in only three months. Kind of surprising because I don't consider myself a great photographer, but I aim to improve :) .

Thanks to everyone on Flickr for their kind words and suggestions.

So
Isn't it so amazing that three weeks ago, AAA predicted that gas would be over three dollars a gallon by the end of the month. And, surprise! on August 31st my local is selling gas for $3.09 a gallon.

Oh, joy.

So
I sure hope that this new service works better than their bloated, pointless flash interface. The fact that they are using flash makes one question just how tuned in they really are.

Even the Wired write up on the company reminds me of what would get VC cash in the 90s: “we're going to make this awesome product that does, er, something, um, everything and people are going to love it...”

I am curious to see what actually materializes “in the fall”.

So
I just fired up adiumx on the Mac to tap into all of the buzz around Google's new messaging offering.

So far, the Google offering seems to have little to offer over the other chat providers. Maybe that will change when they actually have a native OS X client. On the other hand, it's kind of hard to believe that they didn't differentiate themselves and come up with a browser-based messaging client (think gmail).

So
In my estimation, MenuMeters has got to be one of the sweetest utilities for keeping track of what is going on on your Mac (running OS X).

The app doesn't take up a huge amount of space in the menubar, but gives a load of information. It also cleverly links in to some of the Apple apps for more information. For example, if you click on the CPU display, you have the option of running Activity Monitor or Console.

So
There has been quite a bit of buzz this weekend that the Nokia 6682 will be available from Cingular (finally) including, apparently, an advert in Wired magazine.

We'll see...

So
Now this is totally cool — subway maps on your iPod (and free, ta boot). Requires what used to be called the iPod Photo, now just called the iPod (alas, not free).

I was looking for something like this when I was in London on business a few weeks ago and had to settle for a scrollable tube map that ran on my Nokia 6620 phone.

So
I thought that this was a brilliant little java applet that allows you to examine the popularity of names over time. Not surprisingly, many of the biblical based names remain at a somewhat steady stream of popularity and that some names tend to come and go based upon television or movie characters having those names.

My name appears to have been most popular in the 30s and 40s and has been in decline since. Suits me.

It also demonstrates a frightening trend of late to have children named after product brands.

So
A Short History of Nearly Everything by Bill Bryson

This book was a suggested read by the 'book club' at work. Frankly, I don't get what was supposed to be so great about this book (or maybe I do). First off, I found the writing style chatty and sophomoric (and in some cases annoyingly so). The way that much of the material is dealt with many times focuses more on the controversy around a given topic or some gee-whiz statistics than on actual substance and understanding.

While I was tempted to give up on the book about 100 pages into, I told my wife that I was going to force myself to finish it, in an ultimately vain effort to find out why it was so highly recommended. The only conclusion that I could come to is that the readers were really only interested in the sound-byte qualities of the book — something that they could chirp in on during a lunch conversation or over drinks.

In comparison, I found any number of books by Simon Winchester, such as Krakatoa, The Map That Changed the World, and The Professor and the Madman to be much more compelling and ultimately satisfying.